Thursday, June 26, 2014

Strategy for Paper 4 of General Studies

Disclaimer: While aspirants might have come here reading the tag ‘Tips for Civil Services Examination’, I must candidly declare that there are actually no objective tips for this examination as such. I believe that every successful candidate has his/her own style of studying depending upon his/her background, strengths and weaknesses. However a proper guidance always helps and it is my endeavor in this blog to share my experiences and both what I did and what I think should be or should not be done.

I think Paper 4 of GS has been the most discussed topic amongst civil services aspirants as well as in the coaching industry during last one year. There has been a thick shroud of mystery over what will be asked to test the Ethics of candidates and the query has not been answered very satisfactorily even after the exam has already taken place.

Now as far as I am concerned, I did not spend too much time on this paper. But since surprisingly it fetched me maximum marks in GS, I take it upon myself to share what I did, and what in my humble opinion might have worked for me. As such ethics, integrity and attitude are not new topics of study and are very well theorized in books of Law, Psychology, and Philosophy etc. But since the first day, I did not feel UPSC was expecting us to read all these subjects and theories. It is very clearly mentioned in syllabus that “This paper will include questions to test the candidates’ attitude and approach”. The sample paper put up by UPSC also strengthened this belief.

I often discussed with my friends that while it is not possible to judge whether a candidate is going to become a corrupt or an honest civil servant by evaluating his/her response in few case studies, what can be judged is whether at least the candidate has capability to differentiate between what is right or wrong, or what are various options available in a particular administrative situation and what should then be done.

Case studies carried almost half of the weightage in this paper and I believe I must have done relatively better in this part. Now various theoretical approaches that were being taught in coaching institutes included analysing every situation using certain objective schemes like Deontology, Teleology, etc. or using a particular moral philosopher’s viewpoint to justify a choice. But after reading various approaches, it can be quickly concluded that none of these philosophers could have ever come to a consensus, then how can we be expected to decide which philosopher to apply. So best thing is to use one’s own rational thought to evaluate a situation. Nevertheless, the moral philosophies should still be studied as they can help form the framework to proceed and lend good words to strengthen the argument. Though quoting a particular philosopher may be avoided.

Since we are no law students, and may find it difficult to put forth our arguments succinctly, I suggest to write as much as one can (in the limit of space provided) to lucidly explain one’s viewpoint, as far as case studies are concerned, not leaving anything for the examiner to guess. In various case studies, the question asked to enumerate possible choices and what choice should be opted for. The answer now should not be written objectively, i.e. xyz is the best choice, but subjectively, highlighting why a particular choice is rejected (may be in violation of ethics, conscience or law) and why a particular choice is selected. At the same time, there may be some choices that may appear absurdly obvious, either to be rejected or selected, but they should also be mentioned.

Case Studies that involve real life problems should be backed with various constitutional or legal provisions. For example, in case of sexual harassment at workplace, Vishakha Case guidelines must be quoted. In case of child labour, NCPCR has to be brought into picture etc. One should actually put him/herself in boots of administrator and write what he/she will do.

As far as the other part of paper involving definitions or statements and their interpretation is concerned, again one has to avoid bookish language and rather write what the term means in context of Indian administration, or lifestyle and must be backed with examples.

Booklist
  • There was a small book on paper 4 published by Chronicle called Lexicon. It is a very nice book in which whole of the syllabus is covered in brief. This book should be read atleast twice for getting good understanding of various terms. The terms that are not clear should be studied from internet.
  • ARC report on Ethics in Governance is also a good read. Some questions are given in end of the report which can be practiced
  • I also studied Synergy Class notes for this paper, available in market. I found them quite good.
  • Video lectures: Justice by Michael Sandel
  • ARC report on Citizen Centric Administration
  • Some good speeches and teachings of personalities like Jawahar Lal Nehru, Indira Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi, Swami Vivekananda, Rabindranath Tagore, Abraham Lincoln
  • My Experiments with truth by Mahatama Gandhi
  • Relevant chapters from NCERT for attitude and Emotional Intelligence
  • For case studies, I held discussions with friends. Case studies are available in excess in market.
  • Apart from the above, I looked through many other sheets and notes that I came across, but they were not of great use.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Book List for General Studies (Paper 1, 2 and 3)

Disclaimer: While aspirants might have come here reading the tag ‘Tips for Civil Services Examination’, I must candidly declare that there are actually no objective tips for this examination as such. I believe that every successful candidate has his/her own style of studying depending upon his/her background, strengths and weaknesses. However a proper guidance always helps and it is my endeavor in this blog to share my experiences and both what I did and what I think should be or should not be done.

I am mentioning some sources for Paper 1, 2 and 3 that I referred to. Since I prepared for both older pattern and new pattern, there may appear some kind of overlap of sources and it is not necessary that all the sources are best. Neither all these sources need to be read entirely. Some sources were not referred to by me, but I think can be read with discretion.

Paper 1

  1. Indian Art and Culture
    • New NCERTs on Indian Culture
    • GK Today Notes on Culture for Mains(I got from some friend of mine)
    • CCRT website (I did not read from this source but it is quite good)
  2. Indian History
    • Class XII old NCERT by Bipan Chandra
    • Spectrum for Modern History
    • Book by Wizard Publications and ALS class notes
  3. Post-Independence History
    • India after Gandhi by Ramchandra Guha (I read it before the pattern changed and it is a wonderful book to read if one has time)
    • New NCERT on Politics in India since independence
    • Bipan Chandra’s India since independence (topics on consolidation and land reforms etc.)
  4. World history
    • Old NCERTs Class IX (last three chapters) and class XII.
    • Jain and Mathur book for world history (This book can be read selectively for various revolutions – the impacts and consequences have been dealt very well)
    • Wizard Publication book that came only last year (small book)
  5. Indian Society
    • There were not many concrete sources for society. The Hindu’s editorials are quite good. I searched some more editorials for urbanization and globalization on internet. Topics like communalism, secularism, regionalism etc. can be covered from IGNOU chapters available on IGNOU website.
    • For this topic the current affairs is also relevant.
    • Approach paper to XIIth plan is a wonderful document and a must read for a number of GS topics. In my humble opinion, the whole plan should be avoided
  6. Indian and World Geography
    • New NCERT of class 11 and 12 are a must read.
    • I also did ALS class notes and their wizard publication book
    • Old NCERTs of class 6, 7 and 8 that deals with different continents
    • GC Leong also helps in strengthening the concepts
    • Mrunal.org has some very good articles on Geography
Paper 2
  1. Polity
    • Lakshmikanth’s Indian Polity is THE book for Indian polity and Indian Constitution. DD Basu can be used as supplement.
    • Current Affairs from daily newspaper (12 months before the mains examination) should be covered
    • Representation of People’s Act has remained in news and it sufficed. Otherwise some basic provisions can be read from internet
    • Fringe topics can be covered from any coaching notes. I referred to Vision IAS online notes
  2. Government Schemes, Policies etc.
    • For this newspaper is sufficient. I made detailed notes of any policy, law, bill, scheme or government proposal that appeared in newspaper from internet and revised it time and again. Later some monthly magazine or coaching crash course material can be seen if time allows (not necessary)
  3. NGO, SHG
    • ARC report on Social Capital (quick reading of relevant chapters)
    • A issue of Yojana on this topic (can be found on Yojana website)
    • Vision IAS notes on many paper 2 topics are good
  4. E Governance, transparency citizen charter etc.
    • Vision IAS notes
    • Mohit Bhattacharya book on New Horizons of Public administration (relevant pages)
  5. International and bilateral relations
    • Again for this The Hindu is best source. Editorials of The Hindu comprehensively cover this topic. But background of any issue that comes up, be it Iraq crisis or Nepal constitutional crisis etc. must be covered from internet for complete understanding. Mrunal.org is also helpful.
    • Shashi Tharoor’s Pax Indica is a good read for bilateral relations and a futuristic perspective.
  6. Approach paper to 12th plan again.
Paper 3
  1. Economics
    • Any coaching notes for the basics of Economics and Indian Economy
    • Newspaper for current affairs. Indian express is better than The Hindu for economics.
    • Economic survey
  2. Cropping Pattern and Food Processing
    • ALS printed notes (can be taken from those who join coaching)
  3. Land Reforms
    • Bipan Chandra and some relevant Yojana issue
  4. Other Economics topics + Infrastructure
    • I covered fringe topics from Vision IAS online notes
    • Approach paper to XII plan
  5. Science and Technology
    • There is no fixed source. But ALS printed notes on Science and Technology are good
    • Apart from that one has to be general aware of scientific developments in world from newspaper, periodicals etc.
  6. Environment
    • ALS printed and class notes
    • I found a small booklet on environment and ecology by Vaijram and Ravi very helpful for both mains and prelims
    • Current affairs from The Hindu
    • Mrunal.org
  7. Disaster Management
    • There was an issue of Yojana of March 2012. I found it sufficient.
    • For details of NDMA, Vision IAS notes
  8. Topics related to Security
    • Vajiram and Ravi’s Yellow booklet on these topics
    • ARC report on Conflict Resolution
    • Read from Internet detailed background and current status of insurgency in North East apart from basic Internal Security Threats
Some good websites that can be occasionally visited.

  • http://thediplomat.com/
  • http://www.cfr.org/
  • http://www.arthapedia.in/index.php?title=Home_Page
  • http://www.cprindia.org/page/published-columns
  • http://www.frontline.in/magazine/
  • http://www.epw.in/
  • http://www.mea.gov.in/
  • http://www.idsa.in/
  • http://www.satp.org/

The above list is not exhaustive.

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Strategy for General Studies for CSE UPSC

Disclaimer: While aspirants might have come here reading the tag ‘Tips for Civil Services Examination’, I must candidly declare that there are actually no objective tips for this examination as such. I believe that every successful candidate has his/her own style of studying depending upon his/her background, strengths and weaknesses. However a proper guidance always helps and it is my endeavor in this blog to share my experiences and both what I did and what I think should be or should not be done.

General Studies has become very important part of this exam as it carries double the weightage of optional. At the same time General Studies syllabus has become so vast that almost anything under the sun can be asked in the paper. Now this often leads to the confusion as to what to study, how much to study etc. In this post and the next ones, I will try to answer these queries.

While I will try to post the study material for each paper later, here I will take up some important points that I realized during my preparation either from my experience or after interaction with various other successful candidates.

Currently GS consists of 4 papers of 250 marks each with each paper demarcated into a very well defined syllabus. While the syllabus appears to be very vast, and yes it is, but it has also been very well detailed and hence easier to prepare for. Now there is no fixed book or study material that can be referred to for GS, so the candidate should be on a constant look out for relevant material and try to complete each topic in syllabus. But at the same time once a good source for a topic has been recognized (whatever it may be), one should stick to it, revise it again and again and hence make sure that neither any topic is ignored nor over emphasized. Many of us have a penchant for collecting lots of material or even reading whatever comes to the market. While reading more and more may be good and helpful, but given the vast amount of syllabus that has to be completed, time management is equally important. For example, disaster management is one of 60 odd topics in GS. Now if one goes on to read 300 pages of report on Disaster management by MHA, it will become very difficult to do justice to other topics.

While government documents are very well written, but they often tend to be oversized, and the net takeaway is very less. Such documents make a good read, but it may become very difficult to revise them and without revision it is impossible for a normal person to reproduce it in the exam. What I did was to recognize resources for each topic in the syllabus and stick to them, not worrying much about loads of material coming in market or on internet.

Last year the pattern changed in March during which I was busy in interviews for my previous attempt. After that I had to get into preliminary mode. So effectively I had only six months for both GS and optional remaining after prelims. In fact, this is going to be the situation almost every year. I think that at least two months in the end should be kept for revision and re-revision of syllabus. I only kept first four months for reading new things and spent last two months only for revising the notes or books.

This year, unexpectedly, 25 questions of 10 marks each were asked and in each 200 words were expected. Now this is going to be trend (as also recommended in Nigavekar committee). Since it is very difficult to write 5000 words in 3 hours, many will be confused how to write the answers. As they say one should learn from his mistakes, even I tried to learn from the mistakes that I made this year (luckily I will not be needing those lessons again). But I wish to share them with others. UPSC expects candidates to have a detailed knowledge about wide range of topics. But at the same time it also expects candidates to be to the point and have traits like managing time and handling stress. So primarily, it should be tried that all questions of the paper are attempted (it is difficult though). But for that all answers should also be known, which depends on preparation. However once already in examination hall, only those questions should be attempted that one knows. One SHOULD NOT do any kind of guess work or write blabber just for the sake of it. It is very clear that UPSC is not awarding even a single mark to such answers. So instead of wasting time on guess work, it should be tried that one writes the known answers well. But at the same time, one should not leave any question that one knows. For that answer writing practice for speed is a must during preparation. Also I think around 150 words on an average for a question should suffice. And a total attempt of 900 marks out of 1000 can be called very good (mine was only 830), if the answer quality is good. Wherever possible, point format can be used in current scenario (previously para format was better). But the points should be well introduced and well concluded, even if with a single line, in a coherent and grammatically correct manner.

I joined test series of Synergy. But I don’t think it is of much use. While the questions were quite good, the checking was absurd. Discussions were OK. But test series are helpful to the extent that it is important to practice writing continuously for 3 hours in exam like conditions before the actual day of exam. But test series are not alternative to answer writing practice. One should try writing one or two answers daily in fixed time and within word limit. This exercise helped me a lot. The answers should be written to very random questions taken either from some test series papers (available easily) so that one gets prepared to attempt unexpected questions. One may often have tendency to think that the topic is not prepared well, so why not write it after reading the topic. Such times never comes. So whether the topic is prepared or not, answer should be written. This practice will definitely show results in around a month.

This is all that comes to my mind as far as General Studies is concerned. I sincerely hope it is useful. In my next post I will put up sources that I referred to for all the papers.


Thursday, June 19, 2014

My marksheet

ROLL NO. :366477
NAME :MANISH BANSAL
MARKS OBTAINED
SUBJECTS
MARKS
ESSAY (PAPER-I)
091
GENRAL STUDIES -I (PAPER-II)
057
GENRAL STUDIES -II (PAPER-III)
065
GENRAL STUDIES -III (PAPER-IV)
085
GENRAL STUDIES -IV (PAPER-V)
100
OPTIONAL-I (PHYSICS) (PAPER-VI)
130
OPTIONAL-II (PHYSICS) (PAPER-VII)
128
WRITTEN TOTAL
656
PERSONALITY TEST
198
FINAL TOTAL
854
Remarks :-RECOMMENDED

Preliminary Examination MARKSHEET



Tuesday, June 17, 2014

A small note on Science subjects and strategy for Physics

Disclaimer: While aspirants might have come here reading the tag ‘Tips for Civil Services Examination’, I must candidly declare that there are actually no objective tips for this examination as such. I believe that every successful candidate has his/her own style of studying depending upon his/her background, strengths and weaknesses. However a proper guidance always helps and it is my endeavor in this blog to share my experiences and both what I did and what I think should be or should not be done.


Science optionals
Science optionals have been doing quite well for the past four to five years. While it can be often heard that optionals like Public Administration and Geography etc. are getting butchered, I think this may be more so because almost 50% of the candidates appearing in mains opt for these two optionals and hence the competition is immense. And UPSC is no longer accepting same clichéd answers picked up from class notes of famous coaching institutions. They are asking very innovative and currently relevant questions and expect expert answers. Moreover, I think a candidate with engineering or commerce background doesn’t have any edge when compared to someone who did graduation in Political Science or Public Administration etc. (of course I am talking about the majority and there may be exceptions). So if somebody is having really good foundation in science then Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics are good bets. The best thing about Science optionals is that once prepared well, one can be quite confident about solving the questions in exam and also estimate marks with decent precision. For example in the case of Physics, once whole syllabus is covered nicely, one can easily answer at least 80% (conservatively) of the paper very well and score minimum 50% (debatable) of the correct attempt.

A word of caution
There are two things however that one must be cautious of before opting for Science optional. 
First. One may find the syllabus extremely simple to look at or find some of the previous year questions very simple (of IIT-JEE or AIEEE level). For example there may be a simple question involving matrix in Mathematics, or one involving Young’s Double Slit in Physics. But one should rather not take impulsive decision based on this first impression and rather make a very informed choice. 
Second. Since Science optional, especially Physics and Mathematics, involve lots of derivations and formulae, it becomes very difficult to permanently memorize these and hence periodic revision is the only key to score well. If one is not able to revise Physics in the week before final examination, he/she may do very badly despite best preparation. In the current pattern mains examination is conducted in a period of five days in back to back fashion. So one must see if he/she has the ability to do that last moment revision swiftly (I will also be discussing how to manage it in this post).

Physics
I opted for Physics as my first optional because of strong interest and base in Physics. While I could also have opted for Electrical Engineering, but I found Engineering syllabus to be relatively vast. I took coaching from Vajpeyi Sir of DIAS in Delhi and was extremely satisfied. He covers the syllabus very nicely and one can even attempt the paper by only preparing from his class lectures (though I don’t suggest to limit oneself to class only). Only the topic of Electronics is not covered completely. Vajpeyi Sir’s style of teaching may not suit everyone (as he is very fast), but I found him to be an expert of Physics (for UPSC CSE) and his test series also helps in good evaluation before final exam. If one is regular in and after his class, I must say there can't be any guide better than Vajpeyi Sir for Physics. For me, he was also my first formal guide when I started my preparation, and ever since he has been a constant source of courage and motivation. The best thing about him is his candid way of telling you your weak points, which can help cementing the preparation. Not only for Physics, but he can also be approached for guidance in other areas i.e. GS, Essay or Interview.

One thing that must be borne in mind is that UPSC doesn’t want to test candidates’ proficiency in physics as it is not a recruitment exam for professor or scientist. UPSC wants to test how good an administrator one can be from the way he/she writes answers of Physics. So while being good in Physics is important, it is not the whole part of the story. Equally important is performance during those 3 hours for each paper in terms of quality, speed and choice of questions. Also only arriving at numerical results may not fetch good marks as in Physics writing all the relevant theory for each question asked is a must. Paper 2 is more theory based than Paper 1. At the same time one must not write unnecessary things to showcase knowledge as that may irritate the examiner. Usually examiners are highly experienced professors of Physics from reputed universities and they look for quality in answer as they know it and not some creative short-cut method. For every topic one studies for Physics, one must also prepare basic definitions (in own words) and while answering, use these definitions either in words or in equation form. Also if some particular phenomenon is being talked about, then explaining the underlying Physics in words is important than just writing simple mathematical solution. Diagrams where necessary must be neatly drawn.

Physics, as can be imagined, is very scientific subject and has to be approached scientifically. Currently each paper carries 250 marks with each question carrying 50 marks. This means each question has to be attempted in 35 minutes (7 minutes for 10 marks) whatsoever. This time limit is not at all difficult to stick to as one has to trim the answer according to the marks it carries. For example, a question may involve a slit diffraction numerical. Now if the question is asked for 10 marks only, then one can simply use the final result of diffraction pattern and apply formula after writing necessary theory. But if the same question is asked for 20 marks then the split diffraction pattern needs to be derived. Also the page length to be filled can be accordingly gauged depending upon one’s handwriting (for me it was around one page for 8 marks in 5 ½ minutes). Since space for answer is earmarked now, one can also take cue from the space allocated. But there is no need to fill all the space given as some write in very small font size.

In this subject each paper has 4 bits. If one thoroughly prepares three out of four, one can still comfortably attempt 90% of each paper, but that leaves you with no choice of questions and hence I recommend trying to complete whole syllabus. Also last bit on Solid state is in any case a bit difficult for not Electrical Engineering students and remains weak. So rest of the topics should be rock solid.

Making Notes

Making notes in one’s own handwriting is a very good way to learn Physics. During the whole preparation of Physics on has to go through a number of sources like coaching material, books, internet. These sources cannot be picked up every time one sits for revision and hence the notes come handy. Notes must also include some important difficult questions which can be quickly glanced at whenever possible. These notes also become important in current scenario when there may not be much gap during the mains exam for revision.

Practice

Solving all the questions of last 20 years Physics papers is the best and must way to practice. One can try writing answers as in exam conditions. Apart from that the last few years IFS (forest) exam papers can be solved if time allows.

Booklist:
Apart from the Vajpeyi Sir’s Class notes I used the following sources

Paper 1:

Mechanics
·         For most of the part Vajpeyi Sir’s notes are sufficient
·         The book by JC Upadhayay can be kept as reference book in general. It is good to give a thorough reading to this book (relevant topics) after reading class notes of DIAS. Central Force Motion, Angular Momentum, Rutherford Scattering, Rigid Body Mechanics and STR are covered well
·         Introduction to mechanics Kleppner -Kolenkow is another very good book that explains the basics very lucidly. Those who find STR difficult must read the chapters from this book
·         DC Mathur is good for solving practice questions and for mechanics of continuous media.
      Optics
·         The book on Optics by Ajoy Ghatak is the Bible for this topic. It is a large book and one often may not find some topics (thanks to bizarre editing) very easily, but it actually has something or the other on every topic of this bit.
·         However optics is one topic where there is a lot of scope to write theory. Sometimes only theory based questions may also be asked. These questions have been dealt very nicely in a small book on Optics by BS Agarwal. I think it is a must to compliment the preparation with BS Agarwal.
     Electricity and Magnetism
·         This is one of the difficult topics (in my view) of Paper 1. Also there are many large derivations and lots of mathematics involved. But Introduction to Electrodynamics by D. J. Griffiths is a wonderful book for understanding the topics of Electrostatics and Magnetostatics. The book is one of the smoothest one may come across.
·         While Griffiths is a good book, but for this exam Electromagnetic Theory & Electrodynamics by Satya Prakash is more relevant. It extensively covers almost all topics of this chapter (except RLC circuits and Blackbody radiation) and has very good solved problems that often are asked in exam.
·         For Current electricity (RLC circuits) I did not do much (though I think I should not have ignored it so much as many questions were asked this year) as I have Electrical Engineering background.
·         Topics of BB radiation overlap with Thermal Physics and hence can be covered in books like Garg Bansal Ghosh or even HC Verma of Quantum Mechanics or Sears and Salinger
      Thermal and Statistical Physics
·         I covered this topic mostly from Vajpeyi Sir’s notes and then supplemented it with book by PK Chakrabarty. But this book is usually not considered the best source and I have heard that Garg Bansal Ghosh and Satya Prakash are better books.
·         For statistical physics theory part I did Sears and Salinger.
·         For Bose Einstein condensate derivation and Helium lambda curve, one can search internet as I did not find it in any book.

Paper 2: Resnick Eisberg is a reference book for first 3 topics of this paper. This I believe is a very scoring paper and is mostly theoretical in nature and hence making notes for this paper is even more important. In this paper one should try to write as much relevant theory as possible in every answer along with diagrams.
      
      Quantum Mechanics
·         Stick to HC Verma’s Quantum Physics (new edition) for this chapter and do it from cover to cover including all the solved and unsolved problems.
·         This book does not cover following topics very well: proof of Uncertainty principle and proof that minimum uncertainty occurs in Gaussian packet; Hydrogen atom full derivation, angular momentum derivation by solving differential equation. Uncertainty principle part can be searched on net and H atom and angular momentum are well covered in Resnick Eisberg
       Atomic and Molecular Physics
·         Atomic Physics: Book by Raj Kumar
·         Molecular Physics: Book by Banwell McCash
·         Reference book: Eisberg
       Nuclear Physics
·         This bit contains many small but important topics and should be covered well as almost all topics are asked with equal probability.
·         I did this part from varied sources. SB Patel is a good book to start with. But for theory part the book Resnick Eisberg has to be read (relevant chapters only) word by word.
·         I also referred to Brilliant Tutorial notes and Notes of Sh. Abhijeet Agarwal (AIR 24, 2010) (which can be found on his blog) for a sense of completion.
       Solid State and Electronics
·         Usually candidates do not cover this topic well because it is very complex in nature and not more than 30 marks compulsory will be asked from here.
·         But atleast solid state should be covered as it is not very difficult
·         One can refer to either SO Pillai (relevant chapter) or Raj Babbar (full book) for topics like superconductivity, crystal lattice, band theory, magnetic and thermal properties and specific heat of solids (which overlaps with Thermal Physics) and basics about semiconductors and npn pnp transistors and opamps. I recommend Raj Babbar because it is small and less frightening.
·         Logic gates, Karnaugh maps, Boolean algebra is also a very easy topic and can be covered from any good digital electronics book (Electrical/electronics students should not leave this)
·         One can skip the topic related to amplifiers and transistors as it may not be worth spending the time on.




Monday, June 16, 2014

Coaching for Civil Services Examination: Is it necessary?

Disclaimer: While aspirants might have come here reading the tag ‘Tips for Civil Services Examination’, I must candidly declare that there are actually no objective tips for this examination as such. I believe that every successful candidate has his/her own style of studying depending upon his/her background, strengths and weaknesses. However a proper guidance always helps and it is my endeavor in this blog to share my experiences and both what I did and what I think should be or should not be done.

The biggest dilemma that one faces during the preparation of Civil Services Examination is, whether one should join any coaching center or not and if yes, then which one. I prepared in Delhi, which is literally the largest hub of civil services aspirants with places like Karol Bagh, Old Rajendra Nagar and Mukherjee Nagar being dotted with uncountable coaching centers. I would say most of these institutions are commercial business centers. None of the coaching center may satisfy completely and some may be a complete waste of time and money.

For those who do join coaching classes

But still coaching has some of its benefits. These benefits however need to be reaped consciously and cannot just be earned by joining a class. One of the biggest benefits that I felt is that the coaching institutes help a candidate get a grand picture of the syllabus of UPSC examination. For example typically any good coaching institution will complete the whole Indian polity in around 15-20 classroom sessions, i.e. around 40 hours. At the end of this period, one will have a good understanding of basics like Fundamental Rights and Duties and DPSPs, or working and constitution of Union and State Legislatures etc. As they say that the monster lies in details, if someone with no acquaintance with our Constitution picks up a book like PM Bakhshi (constitution ad verbatim) or Laxmikanth’s Indian Polity, he/she may spend more than a fortnight and not understand much. So a macro picture of the syllabus is always helpful to begin with. So for a candidate, especially with science/engineering background like I had, with no prior knowledge of what is what of syllabus of UPSC, coaching institutions act as good starters.

Another benefit that I felt that coaching provides is to keep one on her toes. Normally coaching institutions have very intensive programme wherein almost whole of the syllabus is covered in 4-6 months. Also those institutes which also take periodical tests help serious candidates to evaluate themselves and take timely corrective measures, leaving almost no time to waste (as one has to timely prepare for tests). Then one also may meet other serious aspirants with whom a productive group can be formed for discussing current issues and other problems. However, one must also be very cautious of useless endless debates, just for the sake of debating, and unnecessary negative discussions. Also one must not lose heart on seeing a very active participant in class who seems to know everything already and has lots of doubts to ask in and after class. Such candidates may not be the best ones to copy (slow and steady wins the race). Also it is important to keep revising what is being taught in the class (since you have spent the money and would like to get most out of it). However once the class notes have been prepared well, one may move on to other (bigger and better) sources. Also one can skip the classes of portions that one feels very confident of (for example I usually skipped the basic sciences classes), but otherwise I would suggest to attend all classes as skipping classes is a very bad and dangerous habit (given the massive portions of syllabus covered in a single class).
Now coming to some pitfalls that one needs to be very careful of. Some of these may seem too petty to read, but I stress that they are nevertheless important (at least according to me). One I have already mentioned is skipping too many classes unnecessarily. The preparation phase being an extremely painful one, one often feels too demotivated to attend class. Then of course there are friends to distract, or some treats or trips being planned elsewhere. One might think, “I will get the notes Xeroxed later”. But most of the times one never finds that time or good notes later and then there remains a gaping hole in the preparation that becomes a weak point forever. This is especially true, because number of topics covered in a single class are many. Often a thought may also come, “Oh, that teacher is going to teach the same old boring thing, I may rather skip the class and study on my own”. It’s a noble notion, but my experience (and my friends’) says that one often ends up sleeping or wasting time during that time. So it’s better to attend classes by keeping the motivation level high.

Next comes the tendency of considering coaching class as all in all. One may often feel that since coaching institutes have promised to complete the syllabus, attending classes is sufficient. So rest of the time may be wasted. But coaching classes are only a small portion of the preparation and not at all sufficient in themselves. Self-study forms the core of the preparation and has to be taken seriously. So planning the time along with classes is very important so that not lot of time is spent in travelling, eating at tea stalls etc. I again repeat, coaching can only hold your hand, but the steps have to be taken by you yourself. Even UPSC is increasingly modifying its questions that CAN NOT be answered only by what is being taught in coaching classes. (It is a stated policy of UPSC to discourage the culture of coaching). Had the class study been enough, all students in that coaching would have cleared the examination.

But is coaching necessary?

For those who do not join coaching classes

Attending coaching classes is neither sufficient not necessary. Every year a number of candidates crack the exam without attending any coaching class at all. After the pattern change in 2013, the relevance of coaching classes has been exaggerated, but I personally feel it has become rather irrelevant. With only one optional to take care of, which can be the graduation subject of candidate, and GS syllabus becoming so vast that it is not in capacity of a single coaching institute to do justice with it, self-study is sufficient. The NCERTs (both old and new) which form an important part of study material have been written in exceptionally coherent and easy language. Also they are short and can be completed in very small period of time. Then internet has some really good websites (like mrunal.org) which can be referred to for guidance. Though I do not promote piracy, but (since it is completely safe in legal terms) one can buy the class notes and printed notes of good coaching institutes from Old Rajendra Nagar or Ber Sarai in Delhi and use them to begin with. But only good handwritten notes must be purchased that are at least complete.

I will try to put up links of blogs/websites of any such successful candidates who have cleared this exam without attending coaching as they will be able to give a first-hand experience.

Finally coming to the question of which coaching institution to join. Though most of the people already in preparation mode in Delhi would know but for those still unaware, Vajiram and Ravi (Rajendra Nagar), ALS (Mukherjee Nagar and Munirka) and Synergy (Karol Bagh) are well known names in this business. But I am not advertising (was not paid) for these. I joined ALS classes in South Delhi as it was nearer and saved me travelling time and was satisfied with results since I was completely a novice as far as GS was concerned. I only took coaching before the pattern change (for my attempt in 2012, in which I could not make it to final list despite appearing for interview) and decided to resort to self-study after the pattern change. I found ALS especially good for International Relations, Economics and Essay strategy.
I will post my strategy for GS, Optional, Essay and Interview in later posts. I hope the above post was useful.